JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 24, 2005

T-166 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Maria Eugenia Cano Moreno Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al trabajo la seguridad social la proteccion especial a la maternidad la integridad física y los derechos del menor de madre cabeza de familia afiliada al regimen contributivo a quien la entidad se niega a reconocerle la licencia de maternidad por el no pago oportuno de las cotizaciones.

Solicita se ordene el reconocimiento y pago de la licencia de maternidad.

Pago extemporáneo de algunos meses de cotización por parte del empleador.

Allanamiento a la mora del empleador.

Concedida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del catorce (14) de octubre de dos mil cuatro (2004), proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota - Sala Civil, dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por la señora Maria Eugenia Cano Moreno contra Seguro Social EPS seccional Cundinamarca.
  2. Segundo. Ordenar al Seguro Social Seccional Cundinamarca, que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo proceda a reconocer y pagar a favor de la señora Maria Eugenia Cano Moreno el valor de la licencia de maternidad que le corresponde.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, Líbrense las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.