JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 8, 2004

T-1112 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Marina Esther Acosta Ojeda Vs. Instituto De Hemato-Oncologia Betania

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud En Conexidad Con La Vida De Paciente Con Cancer En El Cuello Del Utero Por Cuanto La Entidad No Ha Continuado Con El Tratamiento De Quimioterapia Requerido. Solicita Se Ordene La Continuación Del Tratamiento. Derecho Fundamental A La Sa
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio De Continuidad En El Servicio De Salud
  • Deber de IPS de continuar con la prestación aunque la ARS se encuentre en mora con la IPS
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por no vulnerar el derecho a la salud
Derecho A La Salud
  • Beneficiarios del sistema no deben soportar inconvenientes presupuestales
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida digna
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del catorce (14) de abril de 2004, proferida por el Juzgado Veintiuno (21) Civil Municipal de la ciudad de Barranquilla, dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por la señora Marina Acosta Ojeda contra el Instituto de Hemato-oncología Betania.
  2. Segundo. LÍBRESE por secretaría la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.