JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 24, 1998

T-104 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Maria Del Pilar Castilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Der. A La Vida. Trato Digno Al Usuario. No Se Fijo Expresamente La Preexistencia. Servicios Medicos Colpatria. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Contrato De Medicina Prepagada
  • Exclusión de preexistencias previa, expresa y taxativamente
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. administrando justicia en nombre del pueblo y por autoridad de la Constitucion
  2. R E SU E L V E :
  3. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias materia de servicios y en su lugar TUTELAR el derecho a la salud en conexidad con el derecho a la vida y ORDENAR que servicios medicos Colpatria S.A. le practique a MARIA DEL PILAR CASTILLA CASTILLA los examenes y tratamientos ordenados por el medico tratante y a los cuales se le ha hecho referencia en los hechos de esta sentencia.
  4. Segundo. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al juzgador de primera instancia para los efectos previstos en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Tercero. Hacer un llamado a prevencion al personal administrativo de servicios Medicos Colpatria S.A. medicina prepagada para que se de un trato digno a los usuarios y se examinen con respeto las ordenes medicas.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.