JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 20, 1996Full bench

C-274 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Diego Ignacio Rivera Mantilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1259/94. Art. 14 Lit. C) Y H) N° 12. Reestructuracion De La Super-Salud. Medicina Prepagada. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empresa De Medicina Prepagada
  • Control y vigilancia estatal
  • Forman parte del sistema de seguridad social
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1259/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 14Decreto 1259/94UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. Declaranse EXEQUIBLES los siguientes apartes del articulo 14 del decreto 1259 de 1994:
  2. " Articulo 14.- Divisiones con funciones particulares. Ademas de las funciones de caracter general que le corresponden a todas las Divisiones, algunas cumpliran las siguientes de acuerdo con su naturaleza:
  3. "12. De las Divisiones para entidades promotoras de salud y empresas de Medicina Prepagada. Las divisiones para entidades promotoras de salud y empresas de medicina prepagada tendran las siguientes funciones de caracter particular:
  4. " c) Aprobar los planes y contratos de medicina prepagada:
  5. " (...)
  6. " h) Rendir concepto sobre el estudio actuarial de tarifas de los planes de medicina prepagada, cuando a ello hubiere lugar.
  7. "(...)"
  8. Esta declaracion de exequibilidad se limita expresamente, en el sentido de que el Gobierno Nacional ejercio correctamente las facultades que le fueron conferidas por el numeral 2 del articulo 248 de la ley 100 de 1993, al dictar estas normas.
  9. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.