JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 29, 2004

T-057 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Alvaro Rafael Pacheco Pimiento Vs. Tribunal Superior De Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso Y Tutela Judicial Efectiva. Via De Hecho. Impugnacion Sentencia Laboral. Solicitud Reintegro. Declaracion De Insubsistencia. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Salarios. Fallo Infrapetita. Reformatio In Pejus. Principio De Consonancia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por existir medio de defensa judicial para impugnar la sentencia laboral de segunda instancia
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Recurso de casación
Principio No Reformatio In Pejus
  • Agotamiento de recursos ordinarios y subsidiariedad de la tutela
  • Vulneración
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia, el fallo de tutela de la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, dictado el 21 de agosto de 2003, que denego por improcedente la accion impetrada por el senor Alvaro Rafael Pacheco Pimiento contra la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli establecidos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.