JurídicoESEN
Unification ruling (SU)August 29, 2001Full bench

SU- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Carlos Alonso Lucio Vs Sala Penal De La Corte Suprema De Justicia

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Presuncion De Inocencia. Condena Por Falsa Denuncia Contra Persona Determinada. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Accion De Revisión. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Subsidiariedad
  • Improcedencia por existir otro medio de defensa judicial
Accion Penal
  • Prescripción
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Idoneidad y eficacia
  • Procedencia para determinar presunta prescripción de la acción penal
Accion De Revision
  • Procedencia para determinar prescripción de la acción penal
Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • Procedencia excepcional por vía de hecho
Debido Proceso
  • Vulneración por falta de competencia del juez
7 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de 4 de diciembre de 2000, proferida por el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, -Seccion Cuarta- Subseccion "A" que denego la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Carlos Alonso Lucio Lopez, y en su lugar DECLARARLA improcedente.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria dese cumplimiento a lo establecido en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.