JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 24, 2002

T-054 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Jose Alexander Becerra Londoño Vs. Secretaria De Salud De Palmira

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida De Persona Con Vih. Solicitud Tratamiento Medico. Inscripcion Y Carnetizacion En Regimen Subsidiado. Sisben. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Enfermo De Sida
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida
  • Obligación del municipio de asignarle cupo en una ARS
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. tercero. Penal del Circuito de Palmira, Valle el 3 de julio de 2001, al resolver sobre la accion de tutela incoada por Jose Alexander Becerra Londono contra la Secretaria de Salud Publica Municipal de Palmira y en su lugar, conceder la proteccion de los derechos a la salud y la vida del accionante, inaplicando en el caso concreto las disposiciones de rango reglamentario que, dadas las circunstancias del enfermo, son incompatibles con el articulo 11 de la Constitucion.
  3. Segundo. Ordenar a la Gerente de Salud Publica de Palmira que, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion del presente fallo, inscriba y carnetice en el regimen subsidiado a Jose Alexander Becerra Londono y se le garantice el tratamiento que requiere para la recuperacion de su salud.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.