JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 27, 2005

T-050 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Omaira Garcia Dangon Vs. Hospital Marino Zuleta Ramirez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Madre Cabeza De Familia
  • Protección por vinculación laboral
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Trabajador
  • Hipótesis fácticas mínimas de vulneración por no pago de salarios
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derechos a la subsistencia la dignidad la familia y la seguridad social de auxiliar de enfermeria a quien el hospital le adeuda salarios de varios meses.

Solicita se ordene el pago de los salarios adeudados.

Procedencia excepcional de la accion de tutela para hacer efectivo el cobro de acreencias laborales.

Existe una vulneracion al minimo vital.

Concedida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Valledupar, dentro de la acción de tutela promovida por Omaira García Dangon contra E.S.E. Hospital Marino Zuleta Ramírez y en su lugar CONFIRMAR la proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de La Paz - Cesar - .
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.