JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 21, 1998Full bench

C-599 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Julio Alberto Corredor Espitia

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 100/93. Art. 169. Planes Complementarios De Salud. Exequible. Ver La Sentencia <a Href=../1996/C-663-96y.Rtf> C-663/96</A><a Href=../1998/C-112-98.Rtf> C-112/98</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 169Ley 100/93UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. ESTARSE a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-663 de 1996 que declaro exequible el articulo demandado, pero solo en cuanto no desconocio el derecho a la autonomia y al libre desarrollo de la personalidad de los trabajadores independientes con capacidad de pago.
  4. Segundo. ESTARSE a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-112 de 1998 que declaro exequible la frase que seran financiados en su totalidad por el afiliado con recursos distintos a las cotizaciones obligatorias previstas en el articulo 204 de la presente ley del articulo 169 de la Ley 100 de 1993.
  5. TERCERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresion Las Entidades Promotoras de Salud podran ofrecer planes complementarios al Plan Obligatorio de Salud del articulo 169 de la Ley 100 de 1993.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.