C-1052 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Jose Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Cargo consistente en la omisión de incluir a uno de los varios grupos eventualmente excluidos
- Formulación de motivos sin acusar específicamente el texto de la disposición demandada
- Norma inexistente o deducida por el demandante
- No versa sobre normas inexistentes o deducidas por el demandante
- Objeto
- No persigue inclusión de subgrupos aparentemente excluidos del universo de la norma
- Finalidad no es garantizar los intereses de grupos particulares
- Facultad de establecer diferenciaciones
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Decreto ley 2090 de 2003 art. 2 (parcial).
Se definen las actividades de alto riesgo para la salud del trabajador y se modifican y señalan las condiciones requisitos y beneficios del regimen de pensiones de los trabajadores que laboran en dichas actividad
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 2090/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- RESUELVE
- INHIBIRSE para decidir de fondo sobre la demanda de inconstitucionalidad instaurada contra la expresión "cuerpos de", contenida en el numeral 6 del artículo 2 del Decreto Ley 2090 de 2003.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.