JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 21, 2001Full bench

C-201 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant William Duque Idarraga

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma De La Ley 454 De 1998
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Señalamiento de razones
  • Concepto de violación
  • Cargos de inconveniencia y aplicación práctica
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 454 de 1998.

Arts. 41 (p.) 42 (p.) 43 44 y 46.

Economia solidaria.

Cooperativas de ahorro y credito.

Aportes sociales.

Conversion.

Especializacion.

Excepciones.

Sustraccion de materia.

Ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.

Inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 454/98. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 41Ley 454/98 «parcial»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 42Ley 454/98 «parcial»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 43Ley 454/98DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 44Ley 454/98DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 46Ley 454/98DECLINED TO RULE
5 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para proferir fallo de mérito sobre la demanda instaurada por el ciudadano William Duque Idarraga contra varios artículos de la Ley 454 de 1998.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.