C-480 de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
✓Claimant Mercedes Salgado De Gutierrez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Apreciación de las razones debe hacerse con aplicación al principio pro actione
- Errónea interpretación de norma acusada
- Necesidad de razones conducentes
- No existe concordancia entre el texto de la norma y el cargo formulado
- Razones claras, ciertas, específicas, pertinentes y suficientes
- No configuración
- Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
- Requisitos
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 624/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE
- Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad de las expresiones "provenientes de la relacion laboral o legal y reglamentaria", "solo aplicable a los asalariados" y "laborales" contenidas en el articulo 387 del Estatuto Tributario.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.