C-065 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Libardo Rodriguez Rodriguez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Razones del concepto de violación
- Reestructuración de conformación
- Finalidad
- Conexión sustancial y teleológica
- Respeto de potestad de configuración por legislador
- Criterios de apreciación para establecer vulneración
- Vicios de forma
- Ausencia de razones del concepto de violación
- Vicio formal
- Núcleo temático
- Agentes que pueden operar como intermediarios del mercado cambiario
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 510 de 1999.
Arts. 72 73 y 74.
Sistema financiero y asegurador.
Mercado publico de valores.
Superintendencia bancaria y de valores.
Organizacion y fomento de divisas.
Intermediarios.
Sociedades comisionistas de bolsa.
Unidad de materia.
Igualdad de oportunidades
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 510/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (22 points)
- Primero. Declarar exequibles los articulos 72, 73 y 74 de la Ley 510 de 1999.
- Segundo. Inhibirse, por haber caducado la accion, de conocer el cargo por la presunta violacion del articulo 154 de la Constitucion Nacional.
- MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
- Presidente
- ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
- Magistrado
- (Continuan Firmas Expediente D-3620)
- JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
- Magistrado
- MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
- Magistrado
- JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
- Magistrado
- RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
- Magistrado
- EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
- Magistrado
- CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
- Magistrada
- ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
- Magistrado
- MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.