JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 14, 1996Full bench

C-360 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
O.P. Art. 2 Del Proyecto De Ley 162/94 Senado. 186/95 Camara. Por La Cual La Nacion Se Asocia A Los 50 Años De La Univ. Del Valle. Objec. Infundadas.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

9 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Proyecto_ley PL-162-1994/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Proyecto_ley PL-162-1994/96 «Por medio de la cual la Nacion se asocia a los cincuenta anos de la fundacion de la Universidad del Valle y se dictan otras disposiciones»UPHELD
Art. 2Ley 317/96 «Por medio de la cual la Nacion se asocia a los cincuenta anos de la fundacion de la Universidad del Valle y se dictan otras disposiciones»UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. 1) Declarar INFUNDADAS las objeciones presidenciales respecto del articulo 2 del Proyecto de Ley No 162/94 Senado - 186/95 Camara "Por medio de la cual la Nacion se asocia a los cincuenta anos de la fundacion de la Universidad del Valle y se dictan otras disposiciones", bajo el entendido de que el mencionado proyecto se limita a decretar un gasto publico.
  3. 2) Dese aplicacion a lo previsto en el articulo 167 de la Constitucion.
  4. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.