JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 4, 2002

T-823 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Adriana Janet Carmona Velez Vs. Hospital Marco Fidel Suarez De Bello Antioquia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Integridad Fisica Vida Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad Y Libertad De Cultos De Testigo De Jehova. Negativa A Practica Cirugia De Calculos Y Transfusion Sanguinea. No Responsabilidad Medica Por Falta De Consentimiento. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Derecho a la vida equivale a existencia biológica
Derecho A La Vida
  • Inviolabilidad
  • No es superior al resto de los demás derechos
Derecho Constitucional
  • No existe supremacía de alguno sobre los demás
Estado
  • No debe definir como una persona debe valorar su vida
Libertad Religiosa
  • Coherencia entre el mundo interior y su proyección externa
7 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia del dieciseis (16) de julio de 2001, proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Bello, por las consideraciones expuestas en esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.