JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 15, 1993

T-594 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Carlos Montaño

✓
Topic · hard data
Cambio De Nombre. Derecho Al Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad. Derecho A La Expresion De La Individualidad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia del Juzgado
  4. Tercero. del Circuito De Cali, pero por las razones expuestas en esta providencia para tutelar el derecho al cambio de nombre como integrante del derecho al libre desarrollo de la personalidad del peticionario.
  5. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación se envíe copia de esta providencia al señor Ministro de Justicia, a la Superintendencia de Notariado y Registro y a la Notaría Tercera del Círculo de Cali.
  6. TERCERO. ORDENAR que por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación se comunique el contenido de esta providencia al Juzgado
  7. Tercero. del Circuito de Cali, en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.