JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 6, 2003

T-666 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Rosario Lopez Vergara Vs. Tribunal Superior De Cartagena

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso E Igualdad De Alcaldesa Ad-Hoc. Via De Hecho. Decision Recurso Extraordinario De Casacion Contra Sentencia De Segunda Instancia. Proceso Penal Por Delito De Prevaricato. Derecho Viviente. Autonomia Del Juez. Principio De Favorabi
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Viviente
  • Observancia en providencias judiciales
Recurso De Casacion Penal
  • Interpretación del Tribunal tuvo en cuenta la fecha de la sentencia para negarlo conforme a Sentencia C-252/01
Doctrina Del Derecho Viviente
  • Valor de la jurisprudencia en el control constitucional
Juez Constitucional En Doctrina Del Derecho Viviente
  • Análisis crítico
  • Decisión autónoma de adopción de interpretación
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de segunda instancia proferida por el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, Sala Disciplinaria, el 20 de noviembre de 2002, en la tutela instaurada por Rosario Lopez Vergara.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria, LIBRESE la comunicacion prevista por el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.