JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 2, 1999

T-650 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant German Humberto Rincon Perfetti

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Via De Hecho. Reserva De Historia Clinica. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Historia Clinica
  • Reserva no desaparece por fallecimiento del titular del derecho
  • Reserva
  • No exigencia de copia por entidad aseguradora o bancaria de la persona fallecida
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Levantamiento de reserva de historia clínica
Derechos De La Personalidad En Historia Clinica
  • Autorización para levantamiento de reserva
Pruebas Anticipadas
  • Juez puede solicitar copia del documento reservado
Sucesion
  • Carácter patrimonial
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Cuarta, de fecha diez y ocho (18) de junio de mil novecientos noventa y nueve (1999), en la acción de tutela presentada por Germán Humberto Rincón Perfetti contra el Hospital Militar Central y el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Sección Primera, Subsección B.
  2. Por Secretaría General, líbrense las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.