JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 23, 2003

T-606 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Banco Comercial Av Villas S.A. Vs. Tribunal Superior De Medellin

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso De Persona Juridica. Via De Hecho. Reliquidacion De Credito En Upac. Conversion Al Sistema Uvr. Suspension Y Terminacion Proceso Ejecutivo Con Titulo Hipotecario. Adecuacion Documentos Contentivos De La Obligacion. Tutela Contra
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Credito Hipotecario
  • Suspensión de proceso en curso para efectuar reliquidación del crédito, finalización y archivo
  • Suspensión de procesos en curso
Persona Juridica
  • Titularidad de derechos en tutela
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las consideraciones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, la sentencia proferidas por la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia el 4 de marzo de 2003, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por el Banco Comercial AV Villas S.A. contra la Sala Civil del H. Tribunal Superior de Medellin.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.