JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 21, 1996

T-224 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Prospero Valbuena Suarez

✓
Topic · hard data
Proteccion Especial De Los Minusvalidos. Der. Al Trabajo. Insubsistencia. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Trabajo
  • Insubsistencia persona con incapacidad física
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Declaración de insubsistencia
Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Insubsistencia de persona incapacitada
Disminuido Fisico
  • Cumplimiento de normas laborales
  • Declaración de insubsistencia
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota D.C. Sala General, negando la tutela solicitada por el senor Prospero Valbuena Suarez, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  4. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de esta sentencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota D.C. Sala - General, al Ministerio de Comunicaciones y al peticionario de la presente tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.