JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 19, 2003

T-133 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Wvaldo Galindo Leon Vs. Humana Vivir S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida. Solicitud Cirugia Por Herida Con Arma De Fuego En La Cabeza No Incluida En El Pos Y Prescrita Por Medico Tratante. Enfermedad Catastrofica O Ruinosa. Periodo Minimo De Cotizacion. Hecho Superado. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Conce
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Práctica de cirugía sin cumplir periodo mínimo de cotización
  • No se pueden oponer periodos mínimos de cotización ante situaciones de urgencia
Inaplicacion De Normas Del Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Casos en que procede por exclusión de tratamientos y medicamentos de alto costo
Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de septiembre 26 de 2002 proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. civil Municipal de Bogotá.
  3. Segundo. Declarar la carencia actual de objeto.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.