JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 26, 1999

T-121 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓Claimant Luis Fernando Torres Castañeda

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Rechazo De Recurso De Reposicion Por El Consejo Superior De La Judicatura. Sancion A Fiscal. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Via De Hecho
  • Procedencia excepcional de tutela para controvertir interpretaciones judiciales
  • Clases de defectos en la actuación
Principio De Autonomia Funcional Del Juez
  • Improcedencia general de tutela para controvertir interpretaciones judiciales
  • Interpretación debidamente sustentada y razonada
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo -Sección Quinta- del Consejo de Estado, de fecha 15 de octubre de 1997, que a su vez confirmó el fallo proferido por la Sección Segunda - Subsección C - del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, de fecha 11 de septiembre del mismo año.
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE por Secretaría la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí establecidos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.