JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 4, 1993Full bench

C-417 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Edgar Cortes

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1888/89. Art. 51. Regimen Disciplinario De Func. De La Rama. Cons. Sup De La Judicatura. Exequible Salvo Algunas Expresiones.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1888/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 51Decreto 1888/89UPHELD
Art. 9Decreto 2652/91STRUCK DOWN· in part
Phrase struck down«Numeral 3.»
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE, por desconocer el fuero constitucional de los magistrados de la Corte Constitucional, la Corte Suprema de Justicia, el Consejo de Estado y el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, el numeral 3º del artículo 9 del Decreto 2652 de 1991 en los siguientes apartes:
  2. "...los magistrados de la Corte Constitucional, de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, del Consejo de Estado, y el Fiscal General, por causa distinta a la indignidad por mala conducta, así como de..."
  3. (...)
  4. "De las faltas disciplinarias en que incurran los magistrados del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura conocerá en única instancia una Sala especial integrada por los conjueces de la Corporación".
  5. Segundo. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el artículo 51 del Decreto 1888 de 1989, excepto las palabras "...y empleados", que se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.