JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 5, 2002

T-1105 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Julia Baron Niño Vs. Alcalde Mayor De Bogota Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Nucleo Esencial. Solicitud Ascenso En Escalafon Nacional Docente. Respuesta Pronta Y Oportuna. Falta De Competencia Y Notificacion. Deber De Informar. Silencio Administrativo. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Autoridad Publica
  • Alcance y contenido de la respuesta
Secretaria De Educacion
  • La falta de competencia no la exonera responder
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 36 Penal Municipal el día 5 de Agosto de 2002 en el proceso de Julia Barón Niño contra el Alcalde Mayor y la Secretaria de Educación de Bogotá.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental de petición a Julia Barón Niño, y en consecuencia, ORDENAR a la Secretaria de Educación de Bogotá que en el término 48 horas contadas a partir de la notificación de la presente sentencia, proceda a dar respuesta a las solicitudes presentadas por la accionante, en concordancia con el fundamento número 6 de ésta sentencia.
  3. Tercero. Por secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.