JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 2, 2002

T-1060 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Guillermo Gomez Vasquez Vs. Coomeva

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Dignidad E Integridad Fisica De Beneficiario. Solicitud Tratamiento De Rehabilitacion Hospitalaria Para Desintoxicacion Y Deshabituacion Del Consumo De Licor No Incluido En El Pos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Tratamiento solicitado debe ser formulado por médico tratante
  • Razones que debe aducir para negar tratamiento o medicamento
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por falta de pruebas para tratamiento de alcoholismo
  • Tratamiento rehabilitación alcoholismo excluido del POS
Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida
Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Aplicación del precedente
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Medellín, el 23 de julio de 2002, por los motivos expuestos en la presente sentencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.