JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 1, 2010

T-038 de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Yomaris Isabel Utria·Respondent Electricaribe S.A. Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por cuanto la peticionaria no ha agotado los mecanismos de defensa, ni ha argumentado la existencia de un perjuicio irremediable
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Debido proceso.

La accionante tiene una deuda con la entidad accionada debido a que su arrendatario no cancelo durante 5 años el servicio público de luz, por lo tanto presentó reclamación a la entidad accionada para que se rompiera la solidaridad y esta se negó a acceder a dicha solicitud.

La Sala se pronuncia sobre la procedencia excepcional de la acción de tutela para controvertir la facturación emitida por empresas prestadoras de servicios públicos domiciliarios, se concluye que la tutela en este caso resulta improcedente para obtener la protección del derecho alegado y no es el mecanismo judicial idóneo para dirimir la controversia planteada.

Niega.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla -Sala Penal de Decisión- que denegó por improcedente el amparo solicitado en el asunto de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría General la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.