JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 26, 2000Full bench

C-952 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Andres Alejandro Diaz Huertas

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 410 De 1971. Art.828. Codigo De Comercio. Decreto 960 De 1970. Art.70. Estatuto Del Notariado. Derecho De Igualdad. Principio De La No Discriminacion De Persona Invidente. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Razonabilidad de la distinción
  • Alcance
  • Trato diferente
Igualdad En La Ley
  • Alcance
  • Control de constitucionalidad
Igualdad
  • Aplicación efectiva
  • Manifestación como derecho relacional
  • Noción que no corresponde a un sentido unívoco
Invidente
  • Consentimiento
  • Reconocimiento de plena capacidad jurídica
  • Tratamiento particular
  • Firma autenticada ante juez o notario
  • Igualdad real y efectiva
  • Protección
Notario
  • Autenticación firma de invidente
9 topics · 19 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 960/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 70Decreto 960/70UPHELD
Art. 828Decreto 410/71UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los artículos 828 del Decreto 410 de 1971 y 70 de Decreto 960 de 1970.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.