JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 30, 2001Full bench

C-554 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Alexander Lopez Quiroz

✓
Topic · hard data
Principio Non Bis In Idem En Nullum Crimen Nulla Poena Sine Lege
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio Non Bis In Idem
  • Alcance
  • Ambito
  • Ambito penal y disciplinario
  • Excepción
  • Límite en legalidad del delito y de la sanción
  • Morigeración de rigor en existencia y seguridad del Estado
  • No es absoluto
  • Relativización interna e internacional
Estatuto De La Corte Penal Internacional
  • Crímenes de trascendencia internacional
Principio Non Bis In Idem Y Cosa Juzgada
  • Relación
  • Replanteamiento de inmutabilidad
14 topics · 21 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 599 de 2000.

Art 8.

Codigo penal.

Normas rectoras de la ley penal colombiana.

Prohibicion de doble incriminacion.

Cosa juzgada relativa.

Principio non bis in idem frente al derecho internacional.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 8Ley 599/00 «salvo lo establecido en los instrumentos internacionales»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarase EXEQUIBLE la frase "salvo lo establecido en los instrumentos internacionales" del articulo 8deg del Codigo Penal.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.