JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 5, 1992

T-413 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Ciro Angarita Baron

✓Claimant Hugo Fernandez

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Sentencias. Principio Non Bis Idem. Principio No Reformatio In Pejus. Norma Del Estatuto De La Abogacia. Concedida
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por Hugo Ernesto Fernandez Arias, contra de la sentencia del Tribunal Disciplinario de Bogota proferida el 3 de Octubre de 1991 por la cual se le impuso una sancion de 2 anos en el ejercicio de la abogacia.
  2. SEGUNDO. REVOCAR dicha sentencia y, en su lugar, ORDENAR que se de cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en la sentencia de primera instancia, emanada de la Sala Disciplinaria del Tribunal Superior de Cundinamarca.
  3. TERCERO. CONFIRMAR el numeral
  4. primero. de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia por la cual se denego la tutela interpuesta por Arturo Sanchez Zambrano contra la sentencia del 3 de Octubre, proferida por el mismo Tribunal Disciplinario.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.