JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 7, 1999Full bench

C-481 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Rene Vargas Perez

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 31/92. Art. 2 Parcial. Finalidad Constitucional Del Banco De La Republica. Metas De Inflacion. Exequible E Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Banco De La Republica
  • Control de la inflación
  • Coordinación entre decisiones monetarias, crediticias y cambiarias
  • Límites
Junta Directiva Del Banco De La Republica
  • Competencias
  • Inconstitucionalidad de adoptar metas de inflación inferiores a las registradas
  • Metas decrecientes de reducción de la inflación
Unidad Normativa
  • Alcance excepcional
5 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 31/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Ley 31/92 «parágrafo»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el primer inciso del artículo 2º de la Ley 31 de 1992, en el entendido de que la actividad del Banco para mantener la capacidad adquisitiva de la moneda debe ejercerse en coordinación con la política económica general, lo cual implica que la Junta no puede desconocer los objetivos de desarrollo económico y social previstos por la Carta.
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el parágrafo del artículo 2º de la Ley 31 de 1992, salvo la expresión "que deberán ser siempre menores a los últimos resultados registrados", que se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.