JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 27, 1999Full bench

C-383 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Andres Quintero Rubiano

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 31/92. Art. 16 Parcial. Atribuciones Del Banco De La Republica. Upac. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Banco De La Republica
  • Autonomía para establecer valor UPAC
  • Autonomía técnica
Municipio
  • Pago de salarios previa disponibilidad presupuestal o inicio de diligencias para su consecución
Upac
  • Determinación del valor no podrá tener en cuenta tasa de interés del mercado
  • Determinación del valor por ley tomando en cuenta tasa de interés del mercado
7 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 31/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 16Ley 31/92STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«literal f»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE la expresión "procurando que ésta también refleje los movimientos de la tasa de interés en la economía", contenida en el literal f) del artículo 16 de la Ley 31 de 1992.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentEduardo Cifuentes MuñozDissentVladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.