JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 3, 1994Full bench

C-489 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Luis Giovanny Barbosa

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 101/93. Arts 1240 Y 91. Tasas De Interes Del Credito De Fomento Agropecuario. Autonomia Del Banco De La R/Blica. Exeq E Inexeq.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

11 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 101/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 12Ley 101/93STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«parágrafo»
Art. 40Ley 101/93 «numeral 3 en la parte que dice: "...o las que para tal efecto exp...»UPHELD
Art. 91Ley 101/93 «la inciso lusión de un representante de la junta directiva del ba...»UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE el parágrafo del artículo 12 de la Ley 101 de 1993.
  2. Segundo. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el numeral 3º del artículo 40 de la Ley 101 de 1993, en la parte que dice: "...o las que para tal efecto expida la Junta Directiva del Banco de la República".
  3. Tercero. Declárase EXEQUIBLE, en el artículo 91 de la Ley 101 de 1993, la inclusión de un representante de la Junta Directiva del Banco de la República en la Comisión Nacional Agropecuaria.
  4. Cuarto. La presente sentencia, en relación con lo que se declara inexequible, surte efectos únicamente hacia el futuro, según las consideraciones consignadas en la parte motiva.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.