JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 30, 2009Full bench

C-680 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Luis Giovanny Barbosa Becerra·Respondent Ley 31 De 1992 Articulo 53

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Norma Derogada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Acción de inconstitucionalidad contra el parágrafo del artículo 53 de la Ley 31 de 1992, el mencionado artículo regula la naturaleza de los títulos del Banco de la República, el aparte demandado es el siguiente “a partir del año 1999 las operaciones de mercado abierto en moneda legal se realizarán exclusivamente con títulos deuda pública”, según el actor ésta disposición le resta autonomía al Banco de la República.

La Corte se inhibe para fallar debido a que la norma fue derogada expresamente por la Ley 1328 de 2009 en su artículo 101.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 31/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 53Ley 31/92 «parágrafo»DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución Política,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para emitir pronunciamiento de fondo respecto de la constitucionalidad del parágrafo del artículo 53 de la Ley 31 de 1992, por carecer de objeto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.