JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 11, 1993Full bench

C-529 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Guillermo Salah Zuleta

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 42/93. Arts. 2 42 Y 108 Parciales. Control Fiscal Financiero Y Organismos Que La Ejercen. Exequibles Salvo Art 108.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 42/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 108Ley 42/93STRUCK DOWN· in part
Art. 2Ley 42/93UPHELD
Art. 42Ley 42/93UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLES las partes demandadas del articulo 2o de la Ley 42 de 1993.
  4. Paragrafo.- Respecto del Banco de la Republica y de las funciones que la Constitucion Politica le atribuye en el articulo 371, el control fiscal predicable de esta entidad solo estara circunscrito a los actos de gestion fiscal que realice y en la medida en que lo haga.
  5. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 42 de la Ley 42 de 1993, exclusivamente bajo los aspectos examinados.
  6. TERCERO. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el articulo 108 de la Ley 42 de 1993 en la parte acusada.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.