JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 4, 2005Full bench

C-335 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jose Cipriano Leon Castañeda

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Norma Sin Efectos Jurídicos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad
  • No puede extenderse de oficio a menos que sea necesario para integrar la unidad normativa
Sentencia Inhibitoria Por Sustraccion De Materia
  • Norma derogada sin efectos jurídicos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 863 de 2003 art. 66 paragrafo.

Por la cual se establecen normas tributarias aduaneras fiscales y de control para estimular el crecimiento economico y el saneamiento de las finanzas publicas.

Información contable depurada.

Reporte en el boletin de deudores morosos.

Vigencia de la disposicion demandada.

En el presente proceso de demanda una disposicion juridica derogada que no produjo efecto y por lo tanto a la luz de la jurisprudencia constitucional no es procedente un examen de constitucionalidad de la misma y procederia por lo tanto una sentencia inhibitoria.

Inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 863/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 66Ley 863/03 «parágrafo»DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para emitir pronunciamiento de fondo por haber operado el fenomeno de la sustraccion de materia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.