JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 25, 1997Full bench

C-310 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Carlos Mario Isaza Serrano

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 200/95. Arts. 25-426 Inc. 1 Parc.30-1 Y 175 Parc. Faltas Causales De Mala Conducta Sanciones Regimen Especial Para La Fuerza Publica. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 200/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 175Ley 200/95UPHELD
Art. 25Ley 200/95 «numeral 4»UPHELD
Art. 26Ley 200/95UPHELD
Art. 30Ley 200/95 «numeral 1»UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el numeral 4o. del artículo 25 de la ley 200 de 1995, bajo el entendido de que el incremento patrimonial debe ser aquél que no tiene causa justificada, o es indebido o ilícito.
  4. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el aparte que dice: "....Defensor del Pueblo, Contralor General de la República, Contador General, Procurador General e la Nación, Auditor general y miembros del Consejo Nacional Electoral", del artículo 26 de la ley 200 de 1995
  5. Tercero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el numeral 1o. del artículo 30 de la ley 200 de 1995.
  6. Cuarto. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 175 de la ley 200 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.