JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 18, 1996Full bench

C-319 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Jaime Gaviria Bazzani

✓
Topic · hard data
Art. 148. C.P. Dec. 1895/89. Art. 1. Delito De Enriquecimiento Ilicito. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso Penal
  • Postulado constitucional fundante
Enriquecimiento De Servidores Publicos
  • Es punible a título de dolo
Enriquecimiento Ilicito
  • Actividades delictivas
  • Delito autónomo
  • Excepciones a sentencia judicial previa
  • No es delito autónomo
  • Se puede configurar sin existencia de sentencia previa
  • Sentencia judicial previa
  • Fundamento constitucional de la penalización
Moral Social
  • Idealización como bien jurídico tutelado
Norma Subrogada
  • Efectos actuales
Enriquecimiento Ilicito De Particular
  • Características
  • No es delito autónomo
Debido Proceso
  • Carga de la prueba
17 topics · 15 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 100/80. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 148Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 1Decreto 1895/89UPHELD
Art. 26Ley 190/95UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. 1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 148 del Codigo Penal, subrogado por el articulo 26 de la ley 190 de 1995.
  4. 2. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 1o. del decreto 1895 de 1989.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.