C-095 de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
✓Claimant Edgar Marino Movilla Martinez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Garantías de legalidad
- Alcance
- Formas propias de cada juicio
- Imposición de cargas
- Alcance
- Recurso supeditado a factor económico
- Obstrucción por factor económico
- Obligaciones y cargas
- Carga procesal de prestar caución
- Alegación ante carencia de recursos para caución
- Caución para pago de costas y multa
- Garantía
- Formas propias de cada juicio
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Codigo de procedimiento civil.
Art. 687 num. 8 inc. 2 (p.).
Modificado por el art. 1 num. 344 del decreto 2282 de 1989.
Caucion para tramitar incidente en favor de tercero poseedor.
Levantamiento del embargo y secuestro de bienes.
Exequible.
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 2282/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE el aparte demandado, a cuyo tenor "para que el incidente pueda iniciarse es indispensable que el peticionario preste caución que garantice el pago de las costas y la multa que lleguen a causarse", contenido en el inciso
- segundo. del numeral 8 del artículo 344 del Decreto 2282 de 1989, "por el cual se introducen algunas modificaciones al Código de Procedimiento Civil".
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.