JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 7, 1994

T-571 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Rojas Moncada

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Suspension De Atencion Medica Por El I.S.S. Rehabilitacion Con El Tratamiento. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Revócase la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, el día 22 de junio de 1994, que denegó la tutela solicitada por el señor JUAN CARLOS ROJAS MONCADA, en favor de su hijo JOSE ALEJANDRO ROJAS PEDRAZA, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia. En consecuencia, concédese la tutela demandada, y se ordena al Instituto de Seguros Sociales continuar prestando al menor JOSE ALEJANDRO ROJAS PEDRAZA el "tratamiento de rehabilitación para sus secuelas que le va a permitir un mejor acondicionamiento a su estado orgánico y una mejor posibilidad de integración a su entorno", tal como lo señala el concepto del Instituo Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses.
  3. Segundo. Líbrense por secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el Artículo 36 del Decreto 2591, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.