JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 27, 2004

T-537 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Francisco Goez Zapata Vs. Iss Antioquia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Seguridad Social Y Vida. Solicitud Evaluacion De Nefrologia Para Tratamiento Renal Prescrito Por Medico Tratante. Falta Requisitos Para Acreditar Calidad De Beneficiario. Conducta Fraudulenta De Usuarios. Desafiliacion Trabajador De Se
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Seguridad Social En Salud
  • No se cumple requisito de convivencia mínima de dos años del compañero permanente
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Requisitos para afiliación de compañero permanente como beneficiario
  • Deber sancionatorio y correctivo frente a conductas abusivas y fraudulentas de los usuarios afiliados al sistema
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo de 12 de noviembre de 2003 proferido por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Medellín y REVOCAR la sentencia de 30 de septiembre de 2003 proferida por el Juzgado Veintiséis Penal del Circuito de la misma ciudad, por las razones expuestas en ésta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.