JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 20, 2004

T-481 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Luis Orlando Hernandez Camargo Y Otros Vs. Secretaria De Educacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Igualdad Trabajo Y Minimo Vital De Docentes. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Dia No Laborado Pero Recuperado. Falta Prueba. Oportunidad De La Tutela. Instituto Distrital Castilla. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Inmediatez
  • Improcedencia por cuanto no se alegó ni se probó la afectación del mínimo vital por el no pago de un día de trabajo
  • Improcedencia por la tardía interposición de la acción
  • Término razonable de presentación
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
2 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Bogotá de fecha 16 de octubre de 2003, con base en las consideraciones aquí expuestas.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceAlfredo Beltrán Sierra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.