JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 25, 2004

T-288 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Rivera Vs Servicio Occidental De Salud S.O.S.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida De Paciente Con Cancer Genital. Solicitud Tratamiento Medico De Urgencia. Dilacion Injustificada En Prestacion Del Servicio Por Tramites Administrativos De Eps. Muerte De Accionante Estando En Tramite La Tutela. Carencia Actual
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Fallecimiento del actor no exime pronunciamiento de fondo
  • Fallecimiento del enfermo
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR, por las razones expuestas la sentencia proferida el 23 de septiembre por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal del Municipal de Tuluá.
  3. Segundo. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto, por la razón señalada de manera precisa en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se compulsen sendas copias de esta sentencia y del expediente respectivo, tanto a la Fiscalía General de la Nación como a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, para lo de su competencia
  5. Cuarto. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se dé cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.