JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 11, 2003

T-560 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Juan Guillermo Carvajal Suarez Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Seguridad Social Y Existencia Digna De Persona De La Tercera Edad Con Cancer. Solicitud Servicios Medicos Y Cuidados Paliativos Prescritos Por Medico Tratante. Enfermedad Catastrofica O Ruinosa. Fallecimiento Accionante Durante Tr
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto por fallecimiento del enfermo
Enfermo Terminal
  • Suministro de tratamientos paliativos
Enfermedades Catastroficas O Ruinosas
  • Negativa de los cuidados paliativos prescritos por médico tratante
Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Fallecimiento de actor no exime pronunciamiento de fondo
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 16 Civil del Circuito de Bogota, pero unicamente por causa de la sustraccion de materia que se ha producido a partir de la muerte de la titular de los derechos objeto de la accion de tutela.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que, por Secretaria, se compulsen copias de esta sentencia y del expediente respectivo, a la Fiscalia General de la Nacion y a la Procuraduria General de la Nacion, para lo de su competencia.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, LIBRESE la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.