JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 15, 2001

T-284 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Belinda Florez De Guevara Vs. Saludcoop

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Igualdad Vida Integridad Y Salud De Persona De La Tercera Edad. Suministro Medicamentos No Incluidos En El Pos. Accion De Repeticion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad
Inaplicacion De Normas Del Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Casos en que procede por exclusión de tratamientos y medicamentos de alto costo
Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Suministro de medicamentos excluidos del POS
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de 28 de abril de 2000, proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal del Circuito de Neiva, por medio de la cual se tutelaron los derechos fundamentales a la igualdad, a la vida y a la salud de la señora Belinda Flórez de Guevara.
  3. Segundo. ADVERTIR a la E.P.S. SaludCoop E.P.S. que le asiste el derecho de repetir lo que pague en cumplimiento de la orden emitida en esta sentencia, ante la cuenta respectiva del FOSYGA, que deberá reconocer ese valor dentro de los treinta (30) días siguientes al del envío de la cuenta de cobro correspondiente.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.