JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 11, 2002

T-255 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Leonardo Aljure Dorronsoro Vs. Superintendencia De Sociedades Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho Judicial. Cesion De Creditos. Endoso De Titulos Valores Exento Del Impuesto De Timbre. Cheques. Proceso Ejecutivo Singular Contra Concordato. Legitimacion Para Actuar. Preclusion Terminos Procesales.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para definir legalidad sobre objeción extemporánea en proceso concordatario
  • Improcedencia para revivir términos
  • Subsidiariedad
Falta De Legitimacion Por Activa En Tutela
  • Demandante no es titular del derecho
Via De Hecho
  • Inexistencia
  • Clases de defectos en la actuación
Juez
  • Sometimiento al imperio de la ley
Titulos Valores
  • Cesión ordinaria
  • No existió endoso
6 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el 6 de Diciembre de 2001 por la Seccion 3a de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el 27 de Septiembre de 2001 por la Sala 6a de Decision del Tribunal Administrativo del Valle del Cauca.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.