JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 28, 2003

T-180 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Pedro Nolasco Ahumada Viloria Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Y Seguridad Social. Solicitud Certificacion De Historia Laboral. Estado De Subordinacion. Acceso A Documentos Para Reconocimiento De La Pension De Jubilacion. Tutela Contra Particulares. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Organizaciones Privadas
  • No resolución de fondo afecta seguridad social
  • Solicitud copia de historia laboral para efectos pensionales
  • Subordinación
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el 26 de septiembre de 2002 por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Santa Marta. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de petición del señor Pedro Nolasco Ahumada Viloria.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Compañía Frutera de Sevilla S.A., que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contados a partir de la notificación de la presente sentencia, proceda a entregar al señor Pedro Nolasco Ahumada Viloria, copia de los documentos por él solicitados.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.