JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 15, 2001

T-180 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Maria Emperatriz Avila Cardenas Vs. Presidente De La Republica Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Ejecucion De Una Accion Determinada. Competencia. Respuesta De Fondo. Fiscalizacion Del Manejo E Inversion De Las Donaciones De Interes Social Por El Gobierno. Recuperacion Patrimonio De La Fundacion San Juan De Dios. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • No constituye respuesta estado del trámite de solicitud
  • Resolución oportuna y de fondo
  • No conlleva respuesta favorable a la solicitud
  • Señalamiento de remisión a entidad competente si constituye respuesta de recibo
1 topic · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogotá, Sala General, en abril 4 de 2000 y por la Corte Suprema de Justicia Sala de Casación Laboral, en mayo 11 de 2000 y en consecuencia NO CONCEDER la tutela interpuesta por María Emperatriz Avila Cárdenas.
  2. SEGUNDO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.