JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 13, 2003

T-116 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Guillermo Miranda Garcia Vs. Juzgado 1 De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad De Villavicencio

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos De Los Niños. Solicitud Supension O Cesacion Pena Accesoria De Explusion Del Territotio Nacional. Deportacion A Peru. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Expulsion Del Territorio Nacional
  • Improcedencia de tutela para evitarla
Pena Accesoria
  • Suspensión le corresponde al Juez de Ejecución de penas y medidas de seguridad
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de decisión penal del Tribunal Superior del distrito Judicial de Villavicencio, adoptada el 8 de agosto de 2002.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que por la Secretaría se libre la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.