JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 12, 2000Full bench

C-927 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Sebastian Felipe A. Barlobanto

✓
Topic · hard data
C.P.C. Arts. 207 Inc. 123 Y 5 Parciales 226inc. 1 Y 2 Parc. Y 227 Inc. 3 Parc. Requisitos Del Interogatorio De Parte. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso
  • No vulneración cuando la norma define la forma de practicar una prueba
  • Formas propias de cada juicio
Interrogatorio De Parte
  • Legislador establece formalidades propias
  • Utilidad de la formulación por escrito
  • Formulación verbal en audiencia
  • Libertad del juez en la formulación de preguntas
  • Límite a preguntas que puede proponer el solicitante
Lealtad Procesal
  • Solicitud de prueba de interrogatorio de parte
Autonomia Legislativa
  • Establecimiento de formas propias de cada juicio
Legislador
  • Libertad para definir procedimiento en procesos
Libertad De Configuracion Legislativa
  • Definición del procedimiento en los procesos
7 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 207Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 226Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 227Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 3Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 5Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
6 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los apartes demandados de los artículos 207, 226 y 227 del Código de Procedimiento Civil.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.