JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 29, 2000Full bench

C-800 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Alexander Diaz Umaña

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Del Marido A Impugnar La Filiacion Del Hijo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Familia
  • Diversas formas de constituirla
Juez Constitucional
  • Mayor o menor brevedad de los términos
Filiacion
  • Es contraria a la Constitución la distinción entre legítima e ilegítima
Legislador
  • Competencia para fijar término de caducidad de acciones
Presuncion De Paternidad Del Marido
  • Admisión prueba en contrario
11 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

C.c.

Art. 217 parc.

Impugnacion de la filiacion por parte del marido dentro de los 60 dias siguientes al conocimiento del parto.

Legitimidad.

Exequible salvo una expresion.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 57/87. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar EXEQUIBLES las expresiones acusadas, pertenecientes al inciso
  2. primero. del artículo 217 del Código Civil, en el entendido de que la palabra "legitimidad", debe interpretarse y aplicarse como referida a la paternidad del marido. Bajo cualquiera otra interpretación, el inciso demandado se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.